Making room for the 3Rs principles of animal use in ecology: potential issues identified through a survey

Zemanova, M

Making room for the 3Rs principles of animal use in ecology: potential issues identified through a survey

Zemanova, M

Permalink

Publisher:: The University of Kansas
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: European Journal of Ecology, 2021, 7, (2)
Issue Date:: 2021-09-23

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (3.29 MB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Zemanova, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-3388
dc.date.accessioned	2022-07-01T22:59:03Z
dc.date.available	2022-07-01T22:59:03Z
dc.date.issued	2021-09-23
dc.identifier.citation	European Journal of Ecology, 2021, 7, (2)
dc.identifier.issn	1339-8474
dc.identifier.issn	1339-8474
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/158498
dc.description.abstract	<jats:p>Research on animals is one of the most controversial ethical issues in our society. It is imperative that animal welfare is being considered and the harm and distress to animals used in research is minimized. This could be achieved through implementation of the so-called 3Rs principles for animal research, which are now implemented in many legislations worldwide. These principles serve as a basis for research without the use of animals (Replacement), with as few animals as possible (Reduction), and in which the animal’s welfare is as good as possible (Refinement). While there has been a lot of focus on implementation of these principles, only a few studies have documented the knowledge and adoption of the 3Rs among researchers. One field that has been particularly neglected is ecological research, which can involve many practices that affect animal welfare. Moreover, the knowledge, experience, and attitudes about animal use in ecological research and education has never been examined before. In order to close this gap, I conducted a survey among European ecologists. Responses from 107 respondents from 23 countries revealed that lethal and invasive research methods are prevalent, and that more than half of the respondents have never heard of the 3Rs principles for animal research. Major concerns are also the lack of calculation of the minimum sample size and widespread of dissection classes as part of education. Additionally, most respondents experienced ethical doubts about their research, and did not receive any training in animal welfare or ethics. These findings revealed that it is necessary to implement rigorous standards for ecological research and enforce the implementation of the 3Rs principles. Furthermore, the evaluation of current educational practices in ecology is urgently needed.</jats:p>
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	The University of Kansas
dc.relation.ispartof	European Journal of Ecology
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.17161/eurojecol.v7i2.14683
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title	Making room for the 3Rs principles of animal use in ecology: potential issues identified through a survey
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	7
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Science
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Science/School of Life Sciences
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.date.updated	2022-07-01T22:59:00Z
pubs.issue	2
pubs.publication-status	Published online
pubs.volume	7
utslib.citation.issue	2

Abstract:

Research on animals is one of the most controversial ethical issues in our society. It is imperative that animal welfare is being considered and the harm and distress to animals used in research is minimized. This could be achieved through implementation of the so-called 3Rs principles for animal research, which are now implemented in many legislations worldwide. These principles serve as a basis for research without the use of animals (Replacement), with as few animals as possible (Reduction), and in which the animal’s welfare is as good as possible (Refinement). While there has been a lot of focus on implementation of these principles, only a few studies have documented the knowledge and adoption of the 3Rs among researchers. One field that has been particularly neglected is ecological research, which can involve many practices that affect animal welfare. Moreover, the knowledge, experience, and attitudes about animal use in ecological research and education has never been examined before. In order to close this gap, I conducted a survey among European ecologists. Responses from 107 respondents from 23 countries revealed that lethal and invasive research methods are prevalent, and that more than half of the respondents have never heard of the 3Rs principles for animal research. Major concerns are also the lack of calculation of the minimum sample size and widespread of dissection classes as part of education. Additionally, most respondents experienced ethical doubts about their research, and did not receive any training in animal welfare or ethics. These findings revealed that it is necessary to implement rigorous standards for ecological research and enforce the implementation of the 3Rs principles. Furthermore, the evaluation of current educational practices in ecology is urgently needed.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/158498