Monitoring for fentanyl within Australian supervised injecting facilities: Findings from feasibility testing of novel methods and collaborative workshops.
Nielsen, S
Barratt, M
Hiley, S
Bartlett, M
Latimer, J
Jauncey, M
Roux, C
Morelato, M
Clark, N
Kowalski, M
Gilbert, M
Francia, L
Shipton, A
Gerostamoulos, D
Glowacki, L
Lam, T
- Publisher:
- ELSEVIER
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Int J Drug Policy, 2023, 115, pp. 104015
- Issue Date:
- 2023-05
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0955395923000646-main.pdf | Published version | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Full metadata record
Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nielsen, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Barratt, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Hiley, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Bartlett, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Latimer, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Jauncey, M | |
dc.contributor.author |
Roux, C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Morelato, M |
|
dc.contributor.author | Clark, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Kowalski, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Francia, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Shipton, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Gerostamoulos, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Glowacki, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, T | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-31T03:28:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-18 | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-31T03:28:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Int J Drug Policy, 2023, 115, pp. 104015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0955-3959 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-4758 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/175121 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Australia is yet to see widespread fentanyl-contaminated heroin, despite the established presence of fentanyl in other countries. International mortality trends alongside a local cluster of fentanyl-related deaths prompted interest in developing methods to monitor for fentanyl and other potentially harmful novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in Australia. METHODS: We tested novel methods to monitor for fentanyl and other NPS. From 2017-2021, clients from supervised injecting facilities (SIFs) in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, contributed urine screens (UDS) with BTNX Rapid Response™ fentanyl test strips (FTS) paired with surveys, and injecting equipment associated with opioid overdoses for laboratory analysis. A single site piloted drug checking using FTS with laboratory confirmation. Two workshops were conducted with SIF staff, content experts and people with lived experience to determine how results can inform practices within SIFs. RESULTS: Of the 911 UDS with FTS conducted, less than 1% (n=8) yielded positive results that were not explained by self-reported pharmaceutical fentanyl use, with two laboratory confirmed fentanyl positive results. Injecting equipment from 59 overdoses was tested and neither fentanyl nor other NPS were identified. Drug checking with FTS (n=34) indicated the presence of fentanyl on three tests. Two specimens were subsequently sent for laboratory testing and classified as false positives as the presence of fentanyl was not confirmed. Workshop participants (n=21) felt routine monitoring with FTS currently had limited value. A process for using pre-defined signals to trigger surveillance was developed. CONCLUSION: The high false positive rates with FTS, relative to the small number of positive results and potential for them to undermine confidence in FTS emphasised the need for confirmatory testing. The role of routine surveillance was unclear within the current low-fentanyl context, however, a process was developed to upscale testing should signals of increased fentanyl prevalence in the Australian heroin market emerge. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | |
dc.relation | Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged CareNCR3SF16 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Int J Drug Policy | |
dc.relation.isbasedon | 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104015 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 16 Studies in Human Society, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences | |
dc.subject.classification | Substance Abuse | |
dc.subject.classification | 4206 Public health | |
dc.subject.classification | 4407 Policy and administration | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Fentanyl | |
dc.subject.mesh | Heroin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Needle-Exchange Programs | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feasibility Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Opioid | |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Overdose | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Heroin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Fentanyl | |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Opioid | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feasibility Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Needle-Exchange Programs | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Overdose | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Fentanyl | |
dc.subject.mesh | Heroin | |
dc.subject.mesh | Needle-Exchange Programs | |
dc.subject.mesh | Feasibility Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Australia | |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Opioid | |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Overdose | |
dc.title | Monitoring for fentanyl within Australian supervised injecting facilities: Findings from feasibility testing of novel methods and collaborative workshops. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
utslib.citation.volume | 115 | |
utslib.location.activity | Netherlands | |
utslib.for | 11 Medical and Health Sciences | |
utslib.for | 16 Studies in Human Society | |
utslib.for | 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Science | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CFS - Centre for Forensic Science | |
pubs.organisational-group | University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Science/School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences | |
utslib.copyright.status | closed_access | * |
dc.date.updated | 2024-01-31T03:28:47Z | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 115 |
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Australia is yet to see widespread fentanyl-contaminated heroin, despite the established presence of fentanyl in other countries. International mortality trends alongside a local cluster of fentanyl-related deaths prompted interest in developing methods to monitor for fentanyl and other potentially harmful novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in Australia. METHODS: We tested novel methods to monitor for fentanyl and other NPS. From 2017-2021, clients from supervised injecting facilities (SIFs) in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, contributed urine screens (UDS) with BTNX Rapid Response™ fentanyl test strips (FTS) paired with surveys, and injecting equipment associated with opioid overdoses for laboratory analysis. A single site piloted drug checking using FTS with laboratory confirmation. Two workshops were conducted with SIF staff, content experts and people with lived experience to determine how results can inform practices within SIFs. RESULTS: Of the 911 UDS with FTS conducted, less than 1% (n=8) yielded positive results that were not explained by self-reported pharmaceutical fentanyl use, with two laboratory confirmed fentanyl positive results. Injecting equipment from 59 overdoses was tested and neither fentanyl nor other NPS were identified. Drug checking with FTS (n=34) indicated the presence of fentanyl on three tests. Two specimens were subsequently sent for laboratory testing and classified as false positives as the presence of fentanyl was not confirmed. Workshop participants (n=21) felt routine monitoring with FTS currently had limited value. A process for using pre-defined signals to trigger surveillance was developed. CONCLUSION: The high false positive rates with FTS, relative to the small number of positive results and potential for them to undermine confidence in FTS emphasised the need for confirmatory testing. The role of routine surveillance was unclear within the current low-fentanyl context, however, a process was developed to upscale testing should signals of increased fentanyl prevalence in the Australian heroin market emerge.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Download statistics for the last 12 months
Not enough data to produce graph