Comparison of microscopy, culture, and conventional polymerase chain reaction for detection of Blastocystis sp. in clinical stool samples
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2011, 84 (2), pp. 308 - 312
- Issue Date:
- 2011-02-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2009007264OK.pdf | 432.59 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
We tested 513 stool samples from patients in Sydney, Australia for Blastocystis by using five diagnostic techniques: microscopy of a permanently stained smear using a modified iron-hematoxylin stain, two xenic culture systems (a modified Boeck and Drbohlav's medium and tryptone, yeast extract, glucose, methionine-9 medium), and two published conventional polymerase chain reaction methods specific for the small subunit ribosomal DNA. Ninety-eight (19%) samples were positive for Blastocystis in one or more of the diagnostic techniques. The PCR 2 method was the most sensitive at detecting Blastocystis with a sensitivity of 94%, and the least sensitive was microscopy of the permanent stain (48%). Subtype 3 was the most predominant subtype (present in 43% of samples assigned to this group). This study highlights the low sensitivity of microscopy when used as the sole diagnostic modality for detection of Blastocystis sp. Copyright © 2011 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: