On the use of Bayesian model averaging for covariate selection in epidemiological modeling
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 2013, 7 (2), pp. 233 - 247
- Issue Date:
- 2013-01-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2013004404OK.pdf | 191.27 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is a powerful technique to address model selection uncertainty and recent computational advances have led to a proliferation of usage. BMA methods are of particular interest in environmental health risk assessment because of the high degree of uncertainty that typically arises in that context. In this article, we review a variety of approaches to conducting BMA and compare four implementations in a setting where there are a number of potential predictors. We then use these four methods to calculate risk assessment measures that account for the uncertainty involved in modeling environmental exposures. These methods are used to reexamine data from a study conducted by Walkowiak et al. (2001) to investigate the effects of maternal polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on cognitive development in early childhood. This case study reveals that different strategies for implementing BMA can yield varying risk assessment results. We conclude with some practical recommendations. © 2013 Copyright Grace Scientific Publishing, LLC.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: