For better, for worse? What to do when celebrity endorsement goes bad

Publisher:
World Advertising Research Center
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Journal of Advertising Research, 2013, 53 (1), pp. 15 - 30
Issue Date:
2013-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Manuscript_ForBetterForWorse_R1.pdf693.03 kB
Adobe PDF
This experimental study examined what is the optimal decision for a company whose brand is endorsed by a celebrity immersed in a scandal (revoking versus continuing the endorsement) as a function of brand/endorser fit (congruence versus incongruence) and of the veracity of the negative event created by the celebritys reaction (denying versus admitting the facts). In the case of congruence, revoking the endorsement is suboptimal with respect to brand attitude and purchase intention. Furthermore, denying lowered the endorsers trustworthiness which, in turn, hampered attitude and intention. Managerial and theoretical implications, as well as directions for further research, were also considered.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: