The Effect Of Dose And Timing Of Dose On The Association Between Airborne Particles And Survival

Publisher:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services * National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Environmental Health Perspectives, 2008, 116 (1), pp. 64 - 69
Issue Date:
2008-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2011008502OK.pdf144.43 kB
Adobe PDF
BACKGROUND: Understanding the shape of the concentration-response curve for particles is important for public health, and lack of such understanding was recently cited by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a reason for not tightening the standards. Similarly, the delay between changes in exposure and changes in health is also important in public health decision making. We addressed these issues using an extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities Study. METHODS: Cox proportional hazards models were fit controlling for smoking, body mass index, and other covariates. Two approaches were used. First, we used penalized splines, which fit a flexible functional form to the concentration response to examine its shape, and chose the degrees of freedom for the curve based on Akaike's information criterion. Because the uncertainties around the resultant curve do not reflect the uncertainty in model choice, we also used model averaging as an alternative approach, where multiple models are fit explicitly and averaged, weighted by their probability of being correct given the data. We examined the lag relationship by model averaging across a range of unconstrained distributed lag models. RESULTS: We found that the concentration-response curve is linear, clearly continuing below the current U.S. standard of 15 mu g/m(3), and that the effects of changes in exposure on mortality are seen within two years. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in particle concentrations below U.S. EPA standards would increase life expectancy.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: