An analysis of angle-based with ratio-based vegetation indices

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44 (9), pp. 2506 - 2513
Issue Date:
2006-09-01
Metrics:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2009001130OK.pdf556.97 kB
Adobe PDF
Remotely sensed, angle-based vegetation indices that measure vegetation amounts by the angle between an approximated soil line and a simulated vegetation isoline in the rednear-infrared reflectance space were developed and evaluated in this paper. Ünsalan and Boyer previously proposed an angle-based vegetation index, 0 (denoted as 0NDVI in this paper), based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) with the objective of overcoming the saturation problem in the NDVI. However, θNDVI did not consider strong soil background influences present in the NDVI. To reduce soil background noise, an angle-based vegetation index, θSAVI, based on the soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), was derived using trigonometric analysis. The performance of θNDVI and θSAVI was evaluated and compared with their corresponding vegetation indices, NDVI and SAVI. The soil background influence on θNDVI was found to be as significant as that on the NDVI. θNDVI was found to be more sensitive to vegetation amount than the NDVI at low vegetation density levels, but less sensitive to vegetation fraction at high vegetation density levels. Thus, the saturation effect at high vegetation density levels encountered in the NDVI was not mitigated by θNDVI. By contrast, θSAVI exhibited insignificant soil background effects and weaker saturation, as in SAVI, but also improved upon the dynamic range of SAVI. Analyses and evaluation suggest that θSAVI is an optimal vegetation index to assess and monitor vegetation cover across the entire range of vegetation fraction density levels and over a wide variety of soil backgrounds. © 2006 IEEE.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: